Agent Native Slides vs Codealive MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Agent Native Slides and Codealive MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Agent Native Slides when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: OAuth 2.0 (Free / Open Source).

Explore Agent Native Slides Details

Choose Codealive MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Codealive MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Agent Native Slides Developer Tools	Codealive MCP Developer Tools
Summary	Open-source AI presentation builder whose actions are MCP tools — create, edit, brand, and share slide decks from any agent. Built on the Agent-Native framework, so every action (generate, edit, brand, reorder, share) is a callable MCP tool over streamable HTTP. MIT-licensed, self-hostable.	Semantic code search and analysis from CodeAlive for AI assistants and agents.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "agent-native-slides": {
      "url": "https://www.agent-native.com/apps/slides"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "codealive-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "skills"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons