Agent Memory MCP vs UnClick

In-depth architectural comparison of the Agent Memory MCP and UnClick MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Agent Memory MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Agent Memory MCP Details

U

Choose UnClick when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore UnClick Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Agent Memory MCP Knowledge & Memory	U UnClick Knowledge & Memory
Summary	Memory, docs, and repo context layer for engineering agents.	667 apps and 1586 actions for any MCP agent, plus cross-session memory and QA passes.
Category & Scope	Knowledge & Memory	Knowledge & Memory
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "agent-memory-mcp": {
      "url": "https://jina.ai/"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "unclick-2": {
      "url": "https://unclick.world"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons