A side-by-side look at the MCP Server Browser and Uindow MCP servers: transport, auth, tools, quality signals, and the config to install either one in Claude, Cursor, Windsurf or VS Code.
Verdict: choose MCP Server Browser for browser automation work as a local process; choose Uindow for browser automation as a local process. You can also run both side by side in one mcpServers block.
Which MCP server should you choose?
Choose MCP Server Browser when
You need dedicated capabilities in the Browser Automation domain.
No tool names declared yet. Check the project README from the listing page.
Uindow tools
No tool names declared yet. Check the project README from the listing page.
Ready-to-paste client configs
Paste either block (or both) into your client config, e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json. We only show a config when the install command is confirmed.
MCP Server Browser is categorized under Browser Automation and uses a local stdio subprocess. Uindow belongs to Browser Automation and uses a local stdio subprocess. Pick MCP Server Browser for browser automation work and Uindow for browser automation.
Copy the mcpServers block from the config section on this page into your client's config (for example claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json), then fully restart the client.
MCP Server Browser is listed as free. Auth: no auth required. Uindow has no declared pricing — check the project's own site. If a server needs environment variables such as API keys, define them under the env key in your client's MCP config.
Yes. MCP clients support multiple servers: add agent-infra-mcp-server-browser and uindow as separate keys in the same mcpServers object, and your assistant will call tools from either one.
On AllMCPs, MCP Server Browser has a quality signal of 53/100 (Good) with 3 views, 0 installs and 39,283 GitHub stars. Uindow has 39/100 (Fair) with 0 views, 0 installs and 7 GitHub stars.