Mcp Server Browser vs App Store Trends MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Mcp Server Browser and App Store Trends MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Mcp Server Browser when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Browser Automation domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: Browser automation via Puppeteer, Support for local browser control, Support for remote browser connections.

Explore Mcp Server Browser Details

A

Choose App Store Trends MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Browser Automation domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore App Store Trends MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Mcp Server Browser agent-infra Browser Automation	A App Store Trends MCP Browser Automation
Summary	Browser automation capabilities using Puppeteer, both support local and remote browser connection.	App Store and Play downloads and charts over time, Android uses bundle ID. Free key at trendsmcp.ai
Category & Scope	Browser Automation	Browser Automation

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "agent-infra-mcp-server-browser": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@agent-tars/cli@latest"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "app-store-trends-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "app-store-trends-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons