Agent Incident Reporter MCP vs Proof Layer

In-depth architectural comparison of the Agent Incident Reporter MCP and Proof Layer MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

A

Choose Agent Incident Reporter MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Agent Incident Reporter MCP Details

Choose Proof Layer when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Proof Layer Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	A Agent Incident Reporter MCP Developer Tools	Proof Layer Developer Tools
Summary	Signed, hash-chained, tamper-evident AI incident records. EU AI Act Article 73 serious-incident repo	Signed, hash-chained provenance receipts for AI agent actions.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "agent-incident-reporter-mcp-2": {
      "url": "https://csoai.org/fabric/agent-incident-reporter-mcp"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "proof-layer": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@proof-layer/mcp@latest"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons