Agent Browser vs Public Browser — MCP Server Comparison | AllMCPs
Agent Browser vs Public Browser
A side-by-side look at the Agent Browser and Public Browser MCP servers: transport, auth, tools, quality signals, and the config to install either one in Claude, Cursor, Windsurf or VS Code.
Verdict: choose Agent Browser for browser automation work as a local process; choose Public Browser for browser automation as a local process. You can also run both side by side in one mcpServers block.
Which MCP server should you choose?
Choose Agent Browser when
You need dedicated capabilities in the Browser Automation domain.
No tool names declared yet. Check the project README from the listing page.
Public Browser tools 1
PUBLIC_BROWSER_SCRIPT_TOKEN
Ready-to-paste client configs
Paste either block (or both) into your client config, e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json. We only show a config when the install command is confirmed.
Agent Browser is categorized under Browser Automation and uses a local stdio subprocess. Public Browser belongs to Browser Automation and uses a local stdio subprocess. Pick Agent Browser for browser automation work and Public Browser for browser automation.
Copy the mcpServers block from the config section on this page into your client's config (for example claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json), then fully restart the client.
Agent Browser has no declared pricing — check the project's own site. Public Browser has no declared pricing — check the project's own site. If a server needs environment variables such as API keys, define them under the env key in your client's MCP config.
Yes. MCP clients support multiple servers: add agent-browser and public-browser as separate keys in the same mcpServers object, and your assistant will call tools from either one.
On AllMCPs, Agent Browser has a quality signal of 44/100 (Fair) with 0 views, 0 installs and 12 GitHub stars. Public Browser has 57/100 (Good) with 0 views, 0 installs and 18 GitHub stars.