Agent Audit vs Agentmap

In-depth architectural comparison of the Agent Audit and Agentmap MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Agent Audit when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Coding Agents domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• You have access to required keys: LIGHTHOUSE_MCP_ALLOW_LOCALHOST.
• Primary tools included: analyze_website_performance.

Explore Agent Audit Details

Choose Agentmap when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Coding Agents domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: TypeScript compiler-based import and symbol graph, Eight MCP query tools, Symbol, dependency, map, and automatic queries.

Explore Agentmap Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Agent Audit Coding Agents	Agentmap Coding Agents
Summary
Category & Scope	Coding Agents	Coding Agents
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "agent-audit": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@fullstackdegen/agent-audit"
      ],
      "env": {
        "LIGHTHOUSE_MCP_ALLOW_LOCALHOST": "YOUR_LIGHTHOUSE_MCP_ALLOW_LOCALHOST_HERE"
      }
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "agentmap": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@raymondchins/agentmap"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons