AgentAudit MCP vs Osv

In-depth architectural comparison of the AgentAudit MCP and Osv MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose AgentAudit MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: audit_log, audit_get_event, audit_search.

Explore AgentAudit MCP Details

O

Choose Osv when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: query_package_vulns, get_vulnerability, query_by_commit.

Explore Osv Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	AgentAudit MCP Security	O Osv Security
Summary	Immutable audit trail for agent-to-agent interactions	OSV.dev (Open Source Vulnerabilities) MCP.
Category & Scope	Security	Security
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "agent-audit-mcp": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "osv": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "osv"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons