Log inSubmit server

Agency Orchestrator vs Vibe Gate MCP

A side-by-side look at the Agency Orchestrator and Vibe Gate MCP MCP servers: transport, auth, tools, quality signals, and the config to install either one in Claude, Cursor, Windsurf or VS Code.

Agency Orchestrator logoAgency OrchestratorCoding Agents · Local subprocess (stdio)Multi-agent workflow orchestrator with YAML workflows and an AI role library; ao serve exposes workflows as a local stdio MCP server.55GoodAuth: not declaredVibe Gate MCP logoVibe Gate MCPCoding Agents · Local subprocess (stdio)Adversarial Quality Gate MCP for vibe-coding: IDE AI vs Critic AI, human decides on deadlock44FairAuth: not declared

Verdict: choose Agency Orchestrator for coding agents work as a local process; choose Vibe Gate MCP for coding agents as a local process. You can also run both side by side in one mcpServers block.

Which MCP server should you choose?

Agency Orchestrator logoChoose Agency Orchestrator when

  • You need dedicated capabilities in the Coding Agents domain.
  • You prefer a local stdio subprocess transport.
Explore Agency Orchestrator

Vibe Gate MCP logoChoose Vibe Gate MCP when

  • You need dedicated capabilities in the Coding Agents domain.
  • You prefer a local stdio subprocess transport.
Explore Vibe Gate MCP

Feature & specification comparison

Rows where the two servers differ are marked.

SpecAgency Orchestrator logoAgency OrchestratorVibe Gate MCP logoVibe Gate MCP
CategoryCoding AgentsCoding Agents
Quality signal55/100 · Good44/100 · Fair
Install commandConfirmedConfirmed
TransportLocal subprocess (stdio)Local subprocess (stdio)
AuthNot declaredNot declared
PricingNot declaredNot declared
Required env varsNone listedNone listed
Verified ownerCommunity listingCommunity listing
GitHub stars2,3970
Directory activity 1 views 0 installs 0 upvotes 0 views 0 installs 0 upvotes
ToolsNot listedNot listed
Full listingView Agency Orchestrator View Vibe Gate MCP

Tools & capabilities

Agency Orchestrator tools

No tool names declared yet. Check the project README from the listing page.

Vibe Gate MCP tools

No tool names declared yet. Check the project README from the listing page.

Ready-to-paste client configs

Paste either block (or both) into your client config, e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json. We only show a config when the install command is confirmed.

Agency Orchestrator

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "agency-orchestrator": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "agency-orchestrator"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Vibe Gate MCP

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "vibe-gate-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "vibe-gate-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Frequently asked questions

Agency Orchestrator is categorized under Coding Agents and uses a local stdio subprocess. Vibe Gate MCP belongs to Coding Agents and uses a local stdio subprocess. Pick Agency Orchestrator for coding agents work and Vibe Gate MCP for coding agents.

Copy the mcpServers block from the config section on this page into your client's config (for example claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json), then fully restart the client.

Agency Orchestrator has no declared pricing — check the project's own site. Vibe Gate MCP has no declared pricing — check the project's own site. If a server needs environment variables such as API keys, define them under the env key in your client's MCP config.

Yes. MCP clients support multiple servers: add agency-orchestrator and vibe-gate-mcp as separate keys in the same mcpServers object, and your assistant will call tools from either one.

On AllMCPs, Agency Orchestrator has a quality signal of 55/100 (Good) with 1 views, 0 installs and 2,397 GitHub stars. Vibe Gate MCP has 44/100 (Fair) with 0 views, 0 installs and 0 GitHub stars.

Popular comparisons with Agency Orchestrator

Popular comparisons with Vibe Gate MCP