Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
AEO Audit vs Pseolint
In-depth architectural comparison of the AEO Audit and Pseolint MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
AEO Audit
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 27/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Pseolint
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 45/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose AEO Audit if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a local process. Choose Pseolint if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's
mcpServers manifest.Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
A
Choose AEO Audit when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
P
Choose Pseolint when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Feature & Specification Comparison
Tools & Capabilities Breakdown
AEO Audit Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Pseolint Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
AEO Audit Configuration
Pseolint Configuration