What is the key difference between FileScopeMCP and Composer?

FileScopeMCP belongs to the Data Visualization category with local stdio execution, while Composer belongs to the Data Visualization category with local stdio execution.

How do I install FileScopeMCP or Composer in Claude Desktop or Cursor?

Copy the mcpServers JSON configuration snippet provided on this page into your claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json file and restart your AI client.

Are FileScopeMCP and Composer free or paid?

FileScopeMCP operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required). Composer operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required).

Which MCP server has more tools and community activity?

FileScopeMCP lists 17 tools with 4 views and 299 GitHub stars. Composer lists 0 tools with 0 views and 0 GitHub stars.

Can I use both FileScopeMCP and Composer together in the same MCP host?

Yes! MCP hosts like Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, and VS Code support configuring multiple servers under the mcpServers object simultaneously.

How do I install FileScopeMCP or Composer in Claude Desktop, Cursor, or Windsurf?

Both servers follow the standard Model Context Protocol configuration format. Simply copy the JSON block from the configuration section above and paste it into your AI client's mcpServers configuration object (for instance in claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json ), then completely restart or refresh the application.

Are FileScopeMCP and Composer free to use, or do they require API keys?

FileScopeMCP is listed under a Free / Open Source model with No auth required . Composer operates under a Free / Open Source model with No auth required . If environment variables are required (such as API keys), be sure to define them under the env key in your MCP client's configuration file.

Can I run both FileScopeMCP and Composer at the same time in my AI client?

Yes! MCP clients support multi-server orchestration. You can include both admica-filescopemcp and composer as distinct keys inside the single mcpServers object in your configuration file. Your AI assistant will automatically select and call the appropriate tool from either server during chat sessions.

Which MCP server has higher directory engagement and quality ratings?

On AllMCPs, FileScopeMCP has a Quality Score of 60 /100 ( Good ) with 4 views, 0 installs, and 299 GitHub stars. Composer holds a Quality Score of 27 /100 ( Emerging ) with 0 views, 0 installs, and 0 GitHub stars.

Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison

FileScopeMCP vs Composer

In-depth architectural comparison of the FileScopeMCP and Composer MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

At a Glance & Executive Verdict

FileScopeMCP

Data Visualization · Local stdio

Quality: 60/100 (Good) | Auth: No auth required

Composer

Data Visualization · Local stdio

Quality: 27/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required

Verdict Summary: Choose FileScopeMCP if you need specialized Data Visualization tools running via a local process. Choose Composer if your workspace requires Data Visualization integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose FileScopeMCP when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Data Visualization domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
You have access to required keys: FILESCOPE_BROKER_BASEURL.
Primary tools included: status, find_important_files, get_file_summary.

Explore FileScopeMCP Details

Choose Composer when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Data Visualization domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Composer Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	FileScopeMCP admica Data Visualization	C Composer Data Visualization
Summary	Analyzes your codebase identifying important files based on dependency relationships. Generates diagrams and importance scores, helping AI assistants understand the codebase.	Give your AI coding agent an architecture canvas to design and evolve diagrams.
Category & Scope	Data Visualization	Data Visualization

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

FileScopeMCP Tools (17)

status

Broker connection, queue depth, LLM progress, watcher state

find_important_files

Top files by importance score with dependency counts

get_file_summary

Everything about a file: summary, concepts, change impact, exports, deps, staleness

list_files

Full file tree (no args) or flat top-N by importance (with `maxItems`)

find_symbol

Resolve a symbol name to file + line range; supports prefix match via trailing `*

find_callers

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

FileScopeMCP Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "admica-filescopemcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "filescope-install"
      ],
      "env": {
        "FILESCOPE_BROKER_BASEURL": "YOUR_FILESCOPE_BROKER_BASEURL_HERE"
      }
    }
  }
}

Composer Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "composer": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "composer"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Frequently Asked Questions

FileScopeMCP is categorized under Data Visualization and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Composer belongs to Data Visualization using local stdio subprocess. Select FileScopeMCP when you need capabilities focused on data visualization and Composer when you require tools for data visualization.

More alternatives to FileScopeMCP More alternatives to Composer Data Visualization category hub