AddCal vs Gitscrum Core MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the AddCal and Gitscrum Core MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

A

Choose AddCal when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: search, list-calendars, create-calendar.

Explore AddCal Details

Choose Gitscrum Core MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: task, sprint, workspace.

Explore Gitscrum Core MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	A AddCal Developer Tools	Gitscrum Core MCP Developer Tools
Summary	Publish public calendars and events others subscribe to: RSVPs, feeds and add-to-calendar links.	MCP server for GitScrum — manage tasks, sprints, time tracking, and client workflows via AI
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "addcal-2": {
      "url": "https://smithery.ai/badge/hello-ub6m/addcal-calendar-links)](https://smithery.ai/servers/hello-ub6m/addcal-calendar-links"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-93": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@gitscrum-studio/mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons