AdButler vs SingleFax

In-depth architectural comparison of the AdButler and SingleFax MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose AdButler when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore AdButler Details

S

Choose SingleFax when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore SingleFax Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	AdButler Developer Tools	S SingleFax Developer Tools
Summary	Manage AdButler campaigns, zones, ad items, VAST, and reports from Claude, ChatGPT, and Cursor.	Send a fax from Claude, ChatGPT, or Cursor. Upload a PDF, pay, get delivery status.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "adbutler": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@adbutler/mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "singlefax": {
      "url": "https://singlefax.com/agents"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons