Actionforge vs Aruba Central MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Actionforge and Aruba Central MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Actionforge when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Actionforge Details

A

Choose Aruba Central MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Aruba Central MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Actionforge Developer Tools	A Aruba Central MCP Developer Tools
Summary	MCP server for ActionForge: expose your account's tools to Claude and any MCP client.	MCP server for Aruba Central: expose AP, switch, and client status to AI assistants
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "actionforge": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "actionforge-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "aruba-central-mcp": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "aruba-central-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons