What is the key difference between Actenon Kernel and ProofSlip?

Actenon Kernel belongs to the Developer Tools category with local stdio execution, while ProofSlip belongs to the Developer Tools category with local stdio execution.

How do I install Actenon Kernel or ProofSlip in Claude Desktop or Cursor?

Copy the mcpServers JSON configuration snippet provided on this page into your claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json file and restart your AI client.

Are Actenon Kernel and ProofSlip free or paid?

Actenon Kernel operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required). ProofSlip operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required).

Which MCP server has more tools and community activity?

Actenon Kernel lists 0 tools with 0 views and 0 GitHub stars. ProofSlip lists 0 tools with 0 views and 1 GitHub stars.

Can I use both Actenon Kernel and ProofSlip together in the same MCP host?

Yes! MCP hosts like Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, and VS Code support configuring multiple servers under the mcpServers object simultaneously.

How do I install Actenon Kernel or ProofSlip in Claude Desktop, Cursor, or Windsurf?

Both servers follow the standard Model Context Protocol configuration format. Simply copy the JSON block from the configuration section above and paste it into your AI client's mcpServers configuration object (for instance in claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json ), then completely restart or refresh the application.

Are Actenon Kernel and ProofSlip free to use, or do they require API keys?

Actenon Kernel is listed under a Free / Open Source model with No auth required . ProofSlip operates under a Free / Open Source model with No auth required . If environment variables are required (such as API keys), be sure to define them under the env key in your MCP client's configuration file.

Can I run both Actenon Kernel and ProofSlip at the same time in my AI client?

Yes! MCP clients support multi-server orchestration. You can include both actenon-kernel and proofslip as distinct keys inside the single mcpServers object in your configuration file. Your AI assistant will automatically select and call the appropriate tool from either server during chat sessions.

Which MCP server has higher directory engagement and quality ratings?

On AllMCPs, Actenon Kernel has a Quality Score of 27 /100 ( Emerging ) with 0 views, 0 installs, and 0 GitHub stars. ProofSlip holds a Quality Score of 40 /100 ( Fair ) with 0 views, 0 installs, and 1 GitHub stars.

Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison

Actenon Kernel vs ProofSlip

In-depth architectural comparison of the Actenon Kernel and ProofSlip MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

At a Glance & Executive Verdict

Actenon Kernel

Developer Tools · Local stdio

Quality: 27/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required

ProofSlip

Developer Tools · Local stdio

Quality: 40/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required

Verdict Summary: Choose Actenon Kernel if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a local process. Choose ProofSlip if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Actenon Kernel when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Actenon Kernel Details

Choose ProofSlip when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore ProofSlip Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	A Actenon Kernel Developer Tools	P ProofSlip Developer Tools
Summary	Verify proof at the execution edge: ALLOW or a typed refusal a model can read.	Receipt-based verification for AI agent workflows — create, verify, and poll ephemeral proof objects
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Actenon Kernel Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

ProofSlip Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

Actenon Kernel Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "actenon-kernel": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "actenon-kernel"
      ]
    }
  }
}

ProofSlip Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "proofslip": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "skills"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Frequently Asked Questions

Actenon Kernel is categorized under Developer Tools and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, ProofSlip belongs to Developer Tools using local stdio subprocess. Select Actenon Kernel when you need capabilities focused on developer tools and ProofSlip when you require tools for developer tools.

More alternatives to Actenon Kernel More alternatives to ProofSlip Developer Tools category hub