What is the key difference between Actenon Kernel and Inforcer?

Actenon Kernel belongs to the Security category with local stdio execution, while Inforcer belongs to the Security category with local stdio execution.

How do I install Actenon Kernel or Inforcer in Claude Desktop or Cursor?

Copy the mcpServers JSON configuration snippet provided on this page into your claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json file and restart your AI client.

Are Actenon Kernel and Inforcer free or paid?

Actenon Kernel operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required). Inforcer operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required).

Which MCP server has more tools and community activity?

Actenon Kernel lists 0 tools with 0 views and 2 GitHub stars. Inforcer lists 0 tools with 1 views and 0 GitHub stars.

Can I use both Actenon Kernel and Inforcer together in the same MCP host?

Yes! MCP hosts like Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, and VS Code support configuring multiple servers under the mcpServers object simultaneously.

Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison

Actenon Kernel vs Inforcer

In-depth architectural comparison of the Actenon Kernel and Inforcer MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

At a Glance & Executive Verdict

Actenon Kernel

Security · Local stdio

Quality: 37/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required

Inforcer

Security · Local stdio

Quality: 45/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required

Verdict Summary: Choose Actenon Kernel if you need specialized Security tools running via a local process. Choose Inforcer if your workspace requires Security integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Actenon Kernel when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Actenon Kernel Details

Choose Inforcer when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Inforcer Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Actenon Kernel Security	Inforcer Security
Summary	Verify proof at the execution edge: ALLOW or a typed refusal a model can read.	Read-only MCP server for Inforcer M365 baseline governance, plus assessment runs.
Category & Scope	Security	Security
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Actenon Kernel Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Inforcer Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

Actenon Kernel Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "actenon-kernel": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "actenon-kernel"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Inforcer Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "inforcer-2": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "github:WYRE-AI/inforcer-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Frequently Asked Questions

Actenon Kernel is categorized under Security and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Inforcer belongs to Security using local stdio subprocess. Select Actenon Kernel when you need capabilities focused on security and Inforcer when you require tools for security.

More alternatives to Actenon Kernel More alternatives to Inforcer Security category hub