Acquis vs Contractor License Verification (TradesAPI)

In-depth architectural comparison of the Acquis and Contractor License Verification (TradesAPI) MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Acquis when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: search_eu_law, get_provision, get_act_status.

Explore Acquis Details

Choose Contractor License Verification (TradesAPI) when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• You have access to required keys: CLV_API_URL, CLV_API_KEY.
• Primary tools included: verify_license.

Explore Contractor License Verification (TradesAPI) Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Acquis Legal	Contractor License Verification (TradesAPI) Legal
Summary	Verified EU law: verbatim, signed provisions with EUR-Lex links. Read-only, not legal advice.	Verify contractor licenses: 50 states + DC + 8 cities — status, expiration, disciplinary history.
Category & Scope	Legal	Legal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "acquis": {
      "url": "https://api.acquislaw.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "contractor-license-verification-tradesapi-2": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "contractor-license-mcp-server"
      ],
      "env": {
        "CLV_API_URL": "YOUR_CLV_API_URL_HERE",
        "CLV_API_KEY": "YOUR_CLV_API_KEY_HERE"
      }
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons