ACMS vs Cv

In-depth architectural comparison of the ACMS and Cv MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose ACMS when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore ACMS Details

Choose Cv when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Cv Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	ACMS Developer Tools	Cv Developer Tools
Summary	Apple Container MCP Server (ACMS) provides access to Apple's container CLI tool on macOS	An MCP server that provides access to Francisco Perez-Sorrosal's CV
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "acms": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "acms"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "cv": {
      "url": "https://tug.org/mactex/"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons