Acme Todo vs Google Workspace MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Acme Todo and Google Workspace MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Acme Todo when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Workplace & Productivity domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Acme Todo Details

Choose Google Workspace MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Workplace & Productivity domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Google Workspace MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Acme Todo Workplace & Productivity	Google Workspace MCP Workplace & Productivity
Summary	An MCP server for a simple todo list	google-workspace-mcp
Category & Scope	Workplace & Productivity	Workplace & Productivity
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "acme-todo": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "acme-todo"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "google-workspace-mcp-2": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "google-workspace-mcp-2"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons