AccuWeather MCP vs Seismic MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the AccuWeather MCP and Seismic MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose AccuWeather MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore AccuWeather MCP Details

Choose Seismic MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Seismic MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	AccuWeather MCP Developer Tools	Seismic MCP Developer Tools
Summary	MCP server providing weather tools with data sourced from AccuWeather.	Unified earthquake data from 20 global seismic agencies, with cross-agency report reconciliation.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "accuweather-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@modelcontextprotocol/inspector"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "seismic-mcp": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "seismic-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons