AccuWeather MCP vs Met No

In-depth architectural comparison of the AccuWeather MCP and Met No MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose AccuWeather MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore AccuWeather MCP Details

Choose Met No when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Met No Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	AccuWeather MCP Developer Tools	Met No Developer Tools
Summary	MCP server providing weather tools with data sourced from AccuWeather.	MET Norway weather (api.met.no behind yr.no) — global forecast, sunrise, ocean
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "accuweather-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@modelcontextprotocol/inspector"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "met-no": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "met-no"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons