Abuseipdb vs Metals Api

In-depth architectural comparison of the Abuseipdb and Metals Api MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

A

Choose Abuseipdb when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Abuseipdb Details

Choose Metals Api when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Metals Api Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	A Abuseipdb Developer Tools	Metals Api Developer Tools
Summary	AbuseIPDB MCP — wraps AbuseIPDB v2 API (api.abuseipdb.com/api/v2)	Metals API MCP — wraps Metals-API (metals-api.com)
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "abuseipdb": {
      "url": "https://pipeworx.io"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "metals-api": {
      "url": "https://pipeworx.io"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons