Open WebSearch vs ExtractEdge

In-depth architectural comparison of the Open WebSearch and ExtractEdge MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Open WebSearch when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Search & Data Extraction domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: search, fetchLinuxDoArticle, fetchCsdnArticle.

Explore Open WebSearch Details

E

Choose ExtractEdge when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Search & Data Extraction domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore ExtractEdge Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Open WebSearch Aas-ee Search & Data Extraction	E ExtractEdge Search & Data Extraction
Summary	Web search using free multi-engine search (NO API KEYS REQUIRED) — Supports Bing, Baidu, DuckDuckGo, Brave, Exa, and CSDN.	Any web page -> clean markdown. Firecrawl-lite, 0.001 USDC/extract (x402, Base), free demo.
Category & Scope	Search & Data Extraction

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "aas-ee-open-websearch": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "open-websearch@latest"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "extractedge": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "extractedge"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons