Arc Gate MCP vs Kody

In-depth architectural comparison of the Arc Gate MCP and Kody MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Arc Gate MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: MCP client-to-server governance proxy, Prompt injection filtering before results reach agents, Capability abuse prevention.

Explore Arc Gate MCP Details

Choose Kody when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: OAuth-protected HTTP MCP endpoint, Per-user isolated assistant state, Search and Code Mode execute flows.

Explore Kody Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Arc Gate MCP 9hannahnine-jpg Security	Kody Security
Summary	Runtime governance for MCP tool calls. Blocks prompt injection and capability abuse before tool results reach your agent.	Personal assistant MCP server with search, execute, packages, jobs, secrets, and integrations.
Category & Scope	Security	Security

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "9hannahnine-jpg-arc-gate-mcp": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "arc-gate-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "kody": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "create-epicflare"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons