24好玩 · 方案空间 vs Agentrisk

In-depth architectural comparison of the 24好玩 · 方案空间 and Agentrisk MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

2

Choose 24好玩 · 方案空间 when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore 24好玩 · 方案空间 Details

Choose Agentrisk when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Agentrisk Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	2 24好玩 · 方案空间 Finance & Fintech	Agentrisk Finance & Fintech
Summary	把 Agent 为客户生成的方案发布成客户专属的微信/手机可读链接，收回客户看了什么、说了什么，再交回 Agent 改下一版。需授权（OAuth 2.1 或 API token）。	Pre-trade token risk scoring API for Base tokens, paid via x402.
Category & Scope	Finance & Fintech	Finance & Fintech
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "24-2": {
      "url": "https://space.24haowan.com/"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "agentrisk": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@modelcontextprotocol/inspector"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons