Magic MCP vs 知己排盘 BaZi — MCP Server Comparison | AllMCPs
Magic MCP vs 知己排盘 BaZi
A side-by-side look at the Magic MCP and 知己排盘 BaZi MCP servers: transport, auth, tools, quality signals, and the config to install either one in Claude, Cursor, Windsurf or VS Code.
Verdict: choose Magic MCP for developer tools work as a local process; choose 知己排盘 BaZi for developer tools as a local process. You can also run both side by side in one mcpServers block.
Which MCP server should you choose?
Choose Magic MCP when
You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
You prefer a local stdio subprocess transport.
Its auth model fits you: API key required.
You have the keys it needs: TWENTY_FIRST_API_KEY, API_KEY_21ST.
No tool names declared yet. Check the project README from the listing page.
知己排盘 BaZi tools
No tool names declared yet. Check the project README from the listing page.
Ready-to-paste client configs
Paste either block (or both) into your client config, e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json. We only show a config when the install command is confirmed.
Magic MCP is categorized under Developer Tools and uses a local stdio subprocess. 知己排盘 BaZi belongs to Developer Tools and uses a local stdio subprocess. Pick Magic MCP for developer tools work and 知己排盘 BaZi for developer tools.
Copy the mcpServers block from the config section on this page into your client's config (for example claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json), then fully restart the client.
Magic MCP is listed as a paid service. Auth: api key required. 知己排盘 BaZi has no declared pricing — check the project's own site. If a server needs environment variables such as API keys, define them under the env key in your client's MCP config.
Yes. MCP clients support multiple servers: add 21st-dev-magic-mcp and bazi as separate keys in the same mcpServers object, and your assistant will call tools from either one.
On AllMCPs, Magic MCP has a quality signal of 53/100 (Good) with 16 views, 1 installs and 5,997 GitHub stars. 知己排盘 BaZi has 41/100 (Fair) with 0 views, 0 installs and 0 GitHub stars.