1stay vs Pixie Vacations Travel Booking

In-depth architectural comparison of the 1stay and Pixie Vacations Travel Booking MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose 1stay when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Travel & Transportation domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: search_hotels, get_hotel_details, book_hotel.

Explore 1stay Details

Choose Pixie Vacations Travel Booking when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Travel & Transportation domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: get_agency_info, search_sandals_resorts, search_beaches_resorts.

Explore Pixie Vacations Travel Booking Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	1stay Travel & Transportation	Pixie Vacations Travel Booking Travel & Transportation
Summary	Hotel booking MCP server. Search, book, and manage reservations across 250K+ properties worldwide.	Book Sandals, Beaches, and cruises through Pixie Vacations with co-branded booking URLs.
Category & Scope	Travel & Transportation	Travel & Transportation

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "1stay": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "1stay-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "pixie-vacations-travel-booking": {
      "url": "https://pixie-vacations-mcp-production.up.railway.app/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons