1Social vs Accessoracle

In-depth architectural comparison of the 1Social and Accessoracle MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose 1Social when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: list_accounts, preview_post, publish_post.

Explore 1Social Details

A

Choose Accessoracle when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: register_account, list_accounts, mfa_compliance.

Explore Accessoracle Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	1Social Developer Tools	A Accessoracle Developer Tools
Summary	Publish, schedule and verify social posts across seven networks from your AI assistant.	AccessOracle - 10 access control tools: IAM, PAM, recertification, segregation of duties.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "1social": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@lobehub/market-cli"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "accessoracle": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "mcp-remote"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons