1inch MCP vs MCP Agentic Wallet — open Source session management for x402
In-depth architectural comparison of the 1inch MCP and MCP Agentic Wallet — open Source session management for x402 MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
1inch MCP
Finance & Fintech · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 45/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
MCP Agentic Wallet — open Source session management for x402
Finance & Fintech · Local stdio
Quality: 31/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose 1inch MCP if you need specialized Finance & Fintech tools running via a hosted cloud SSE transport. Choose MCP Agentic Wallet — open Source session management for x402 if your workspace requires Finance & Fintech integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
Choose 1inch MCP when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
1inch MCP is categorized under Finance & Fintech and uses a remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. In contrast, MCP Agentic Wallet — open Source session management for x402 belongs to Finance & Fintech using local stdio subprocess. Select 1inch MCP when you need capabilities focused on finance & fintech and MCP Agentic Wallet — open Source session management for x402 when you require tools for finance & fintech.