1F4BC vs Remoteok

In-depth architectural comparison of the 1F4BC and Remoteok MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

1

Choose 1F4BC when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore 1F4BC Details

Choose Remoteok when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Remoteok Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	1 1F4BC Developer Tools	Remoteok Developer Tools
Summary	Read-only MCP access to the 1F4BC job board for AI agents.	RemoteOK MCP — remote-work job board (tech-heavy), keyless.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "1f4bc": {
      "url": "https://1f4bc.ai"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "remoteok": {
      "url": "https://pipeworx.io"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons