100Hires vs Nworks

In-depth architectural comparison of the 100Hires and Nworks MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose 100Hires when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Workplace & Productivity domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: OAuth 2.0 (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: Hosted HTTP MCP endpoint, OAuth 2.1 with PKCE, Candidate and application management.

Explore 100Hires Details

Choose Nworks when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Workplace & Productivity domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: OAuth 2.0 (Free / Open Source).
• You have access to required keys: CLIENT_ID, CLIENT_SECRET.
• Primary tools included: Setup, nworks_setup, nworks_login_user.

Explore Nworks Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	100Hires Workplace & Productivity	Nworks yjcho9317 Workplace & Productivity
Summary	Official MCP server for 100Hires ATS: candidates, jobs, applications, interviews, messages.	NAVER WORKS CLI + MCP server. 26 tools for messages, calendar, drive, mail, tasks, and boards. AI agents can manage NAVER WORKS directly.
Category & Scope	Workplace & Productivity

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "100hires-2": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "100hires-2"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "yjcho9317-nworks": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "nworks"
      ],
      "env": {
        "CLIENT_ID": "YOUR_CLIENT_ID_HERE",
        "CLIENT_SECRET": "YOUR_CLIENT_SECRET_HERE"
      }
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons