Webclaw vs Markcrawl
A side-by-side look at the Webclaw and Markcrawl MCP servers: transport, auth, tools, quality signals, and the config to install either one in Claude, Cursor, Windsurf or VS Code.
Verdict: choose Webclaw for search & data extraction work as a local process; choose Markcrawl for search & data extraction as a local process. You can also run both side by side in one mcpServers block.
Which MCP server should you choose?
Choose Webclaw when
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Search & Data Extraction domain.
- You prefer a local stdio subprocess transport.
- Its auth model fits you: No auth required.
- You want tools like
scrape, select, screenshot.
Choose Markcrawl when
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Search & Data Extraction domain.
- You prefer a local stdio subprocess transport.
- Its auth model fits you: No auth required.
Feature & specification comparison
Rows where the two servers differ are marked.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Search & Data Extraction | Search & Data Extraction |
| Quality signal | 69/100 · Great | 51/100 · Good |
| Install command | Confirmed | Confirmed |
| Transport | Local subprocess (stdio) | Local subprocess (stdio) |
| Auth | No auth required | No auth required |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Required env vars | None listed | None listed |
| Verified owner | Community listing | Community listing |
| GitHub stars | 2,386 | 5 |
| Directory activity | 13 views 2 installs 0 upvotes | 6 views 0 installs 1 upvotes |
| Tools | 12 | Not listed |
| Full listing | View Webclaw | View Markcrawl |
Tools & capabilities
Webclaw tools 12
scrapeExtract one URL as markdown, text, JSON, LLM format, or HTMLselectPick values or records from a page with CSS selectors or XPath, its data tables, elements found by text, or every element like an example, as JSONscreenshotCapture a page's viewport or the whole page as PNG or JPEG, print it to PDF, or save it as one MHTML filecrawlFollow same-origin links and extract discovered pages, most relevant first with a `querymapDiscover URLs from sitemaps, a short crawl and the Common Crawl index without extracting every pagebatchScrape multiple URLs in parallelextractConvert page content into structured datasummarizeSummarize a pagediffCompare page content snapshotsbrandExtract colors, fonts, logos, and metadatasearchSearch the web and scrape resultsresearchMulti-source research workflow
Markcrawl tools
No tool names declared yet. Check the project README from the listing page.
Ready-to-paste client configs
Paste either block (or both) into your client config, e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json. We only show a config when the install command is confirmed.
Webclaw
{
"mcpServers": {
"0xmassi-webclaw": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"create-webclaw"
]
}
}
}
Markcrawl
{
"mcpServers": {
"aimlpm-markcrawl": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"clawhub"
]
}
}
}
Frequently asked questions
Webclaw is categorized under Search & Data Extraction and uses a local stdio subprocess. Markcrawl belongs to Search & Data Extraction and uses a local stdio subprocess. Pick Webclaw for search & data extraction work and Markcrawl for search & data extraction.
Copy the mcpServers block from the config section on this page into your client's config (for example claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json), then fully restart the client.
Webclaw is listed as free. Auth: no auth required. Markcrawl is listed as free. Auth: no auth required. If a server needs environment variables such as API keys, define them under the env key in your client's MCP config.
Yes. MCP clients support multiple servers: add 0xmassi-webclaw and aimlpm-markcrawl as separate keys in the same mcpServers object, and your assistant will call tools from either one.
On AllMCPs, Webclaw has a quality signal of 69/100 (Great) with 13 views, 2 installs and 2,386 GitHub stars. Markcrawl has 51/100 (Good) with 6 views, 0 installs and 5 GitHub stars.